PDA

View Full Version : Shiite Cleric Sadr Offers Conditions for Cease-Fire


lily
03-30-2008, 09:56 PM
A step in the right direction. We will now see what kind of leader al-maliki is going to be. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/30/AR2008033000261.html?hpid=topnews)
Shiite Cleric Sadr Offers Conditions for Cease-Fire

By Sholnn Freeman
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, March 30, 2008; 10:06 AM

BAGHDAD, March 30 -- Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr Sunday ordered his armed
militia to get off the streets in Basra and to cooperate with the government
to restore security. In exchange, he asked the government to release
prisoners and declare an amnesty.

The Iraqi government quickly welcomed the comments as a move toward
restoring calm.

A spokesman for the government, Ali al-Dabbagh, said on state-run Iraqi
television that the government considered Sadr's statement a "positive
step."

He repeated government assertions that the military operations in Basra were
not aimed at Sadr's followers. "We expect all those who claim that they are
followers of the Sadr movement to heed this call and those who do not shall
be treated as outlaws and criminals."

In his statement, Sadr made the offer in exchange for the government
stopping "random, illegal raids and arrests." He also called on the
government to declare a general amnesty and to release prisoners taken
during the fighting, especially his followers.

Sadr's statement stopped short of directing fighters to turn over weapons to
Iraqi security forces, which has been a key demand of the government.

The move came after Sadr over the weekend told his supporters to ignore the
government's orders to disarm.

American and British forces on Saturday boosted their support of an Iraqi
military offensive in the southern city of Basra, where Sadr has accused
Iraq's government of acting like "a dictatorship."

Earlier Sunday, the U.S. military said American ground troops had joined
Iraqi troops in battles in Basra against the Mahdi Army, a militia loyal to
Sadr. A U.S. airstrike killed at least 16 suspected militiamen after Iraqi
forces came under heavy fire, the military said. British forces fired
artillery in support of Iraqi forces.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who launched the offensive Monday against
armed groups, vowed "to stand up to these gangs in every inch of Iraq."

Maliki denied accusations that the Iraqi government was trying to undermine
political rivals before provincial elections this year. "We came to Basra to
fight the outlaws and the smugglers, not to confront a party or a political
group, because we do not seek political confrontation," he said.

The U.S. military reported that fighting also continued in Sadr City, the
sprawling Shiite district of the capital controlled by the Mahdi Army. In
overnight battles in Sadr City, U.S. soldiers returning fire killed nine
insurgents planting roadside bombs or firing at soldiers with guns and
rocket-propelled grenades, the military said.

ViolaLee
03-30-2008, 11:04 PM
It's the only way for Iraq to move ahead. They have to deal with the Iraqis that want independence from USA and Iranian control, which is what the Maliki government is all about. Maliki is aligned with the SIC, the Supreme Islamic Council, an Iranian originated, controlled and funded party and at the same time, aligned with the USA. Sadr is against them.

We are calling Iran our enemy while at the same time, supporting the Iranian backed Maliki army fighting against Sadr.


Bizarre. Time for the USA to get out of Iraq

Elrathin
03-30-2008, 11:35 PM
The problem has always been, many Iraqis think the U.S. wants to install the U.S. version of democracy. Unfortunately, due to religion, many Iraqis don't want that idea of democracy.

The thing people have to remember is the U.S. laws were based WRONGLY on religion alone. And not all of a sudden people want to thrown our way of life onto Iraq and say you will follow it? Good luck.

It's like forcing a Christian to watch pornography. Good luck.

apdst
03-30-2008, 11:35 PM
Maliki would appear to be a strong leader and make a hell of an impression if he wiped out the Mahdi Army.

jafar00
03-31-2008, 10:17 AM
The problem has always been, many Iraqis think the U.S. wants to install the U.S. version of democracy. Unfortunately, due to religion, many Iraqis don't want that idea of democracy.


Islam is not opposed to Democracy. In fact the first government formed after the death of the Prophet Muhammed(saw) was a democracy. Iraqis just don't want an American puppet government that will act in the best interests of the USA and multinational oil companies, rather than the best interests of Iraq.

Truth_and_Power
03-31-2008, 03:33 PM
So.. what was the original reason for the start of hostilities?