View Full Version : Drunken, drugged teens in wild orgy
Alonzo
03-28-2008, 02:18 AM
A SCHOOL has had to warn hundreds of parents that their daughters, as young as 14 years, could be pregnant after a school party turned into a drug and alcohol-fuelled sex orgy.
"The risks are real, assume the worst," wrote Alison Hughes, deputy head of Queen Elizabeth School at Kirkby in Lancashire.
The end-of-term party at a hall in nearby Wray was supposed to have had supervision but the children forged signatures and no adults turned up to control 200 teenagers aged between 14 and 16.
Chairman of the hall committee, Alan Day, said he could not believe what he was seeing in his usually quiet village.
"All hell let loose at this event," he said yesterday.
"The children were drunk to the eyeballs. They were having sex in the village square standing up."
As teachers organised handouts of morning-after pills, the school told parents the privately organised party had descended into an orgy, a "disturbingly high" number of children had sex, and they risked pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.
Villagers reported there had been drugs and alcohol consumed at the party as scantily clad girls and boys in underwear ran about having sex in the streets and square.
Mrs Hughes said in her letter the alcohol abuse had been "significant" and girls "were too drunk to be in control of themselves".
"We've had to help a lot of girls through the aftermath of having unprotected sex, most of whom have told us they were too drunk to be in control of themselves.
"A lot of children needed sexual health care.
"Thankfully there is trust between ourselves and the children, so they felt they could talk to us."
Mrs Hughes added that one boy "could have died" from the cocktails of drugs and drink he consumed.
Even by British standards, where underage alcohol abuse and youth binge drinking is high, the weekend party has shocked the nation.
A nearby local pub owner reported he was threatened, then had his pub urinated on when he refused to sell the rampaging teens any alcohol.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23419675-663,00.html
preservanation
03-28-2008, 03:39 AM
Okayyyyy.
What are we going to stop this from happening here?
Emulating the EU?
America has to see that this is the near future and a present reality.
Are we going to go down this road or are we going to establish our own rules and culture as we see fit for the future of our children and society??
The Declaration of Independence was written for a reason.
Alonzo
03-28-2008, 03:55 AM
I think this had to do with the availability of drugs and alcohol, which American kids have, and the lack of supervision due to stupid staff, which America has.
Mix the two together and, rarely anyways, this can happen.
cronic
03-28-2008, 03:58 AM
I went to parties like that as a teen.. drugs.. booze.. 14 years old.. sex to the right of me and sex to the left of me.. only thing is we didn't do it in the village square..
we picked a house purposely where there would be no adults
Adults would have meant.. no drugs.. no booze and no sex
Elrathin
03-28-2008, 04:45 AM
So Cronic, you agree that Drugs and Alcohol should be provided to ANYONE since you supported such activities. Right?
Alonzo
03-28-2008, 04:53 AM
I went to parties like that as a teen.. drugs.. booze.. 14 years old.. sex to the right of me and sex to the left of me.. only thing is we didn't do it in the village square..
we picked a house purposely where there would be no adults
Adults would have meant.. no drugs.. no booze and no sex
When I was 14 we had porn. The drug infested orgies didn't come until.....well.... ever.
cronic
03-28-2008, 05:07 AM
So Cronic, you agree that Drugs and Alcohol should be provided to ANYONE since you supported such activities. Right?
Wrong!
and no.. i can't agree with that El...
atleast nowadays if thats what your asking me...not now..
when I was a teenager.. hell yes
I supported them activities then because I was a teen and it was fun for me as a teen. I'm not a teen anymore so naturally i don't and wont support that kind of behavior because I know its not a healthy activity
Elrathin
03-28-2008, 05:50 AM
Wrong!
and no.. i can't agree with that El...
atleast nowadays if thats what your asking me...not now..
Ok sorry I took it as you were still the way you were when you chose the houses and agreed with it, my fault.
when I was a teenager.. hell yes
I supported them activities then because I was a teen and it was fun for me as a teen. I'm not a teen anymore so naturally i don't and wont support that kind of behavior because I know its not a healthy activity
So you don't support it now that you are legally able to do it but you supported it when you weren't able to legally do it, am I right in that assumption then?
firefox
03-28-2008, 07:43 AM
This is weird. Are you sure this article is credible? I want to think it's not, but I've heard stories that middle-schoolers are sucking each other off like it's a hand-shake these days, so who knows. All I know is that I'm in my early 20s now, and this kind of thing was unheard of, at least to me and the people I know, during the 90s.
Oh, it went on!
My friends all lost their virginity by 7th grade - one of them moved to GA and got into a sex-swapping group in HS.
These parties happen here too - meth is a big sex drug - used to be 'x' I don't know what else. GHB?
One difference though is how it would be handled. Instead of morning after pills, sexual health treatment and counseling, there would be sex offender charges and morality rampages over things like morning after pills and so forth.
16 year old boys would be branded child rapists for life; 14 year old girls equally responsible for their behavior would just be shunned as sluts.
Alonzo
03-28-2008, 01:57 PM
firefox look on google news. There's a lot of credible sources. http://news.google.com/news?sourceid=navclient-ff&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS239US239&um=1&tab=wn&hl=en&q=orgy+school&btnG=Search+News
Wrong!
and no.. i can't agree with that El...
atleast nowadays if thats what your asking me...not now..
Ok sorry I took it as you were still the way you were when you chose the houses and agreed with it, my fault.
when I was a teenager.. hell yes
I supported them activities then because I was a teen and it was fun for me as a teen. I'm not a teen anymore so naturally i don't and wont support that kind of behavior because I know its not a healthy activity
So you don't support it now that you are legally able to do it but you supported it when you weren't able to legally do it, am I right in that assumption then?
I don't understand your argument. Sometimes teens have poor judgement - that's why we don't allow them to make all their own decisions yet.
He's saying when he was a teen he (mistakenly) thought this was cool, and now that he's all growed up he sees it's not.:thumbsup:
Truth_and_Power
03-28-2008, 02:15 PM
Seriously, when I saw the headline I was like "this is news?"
Pres you are like a broken record with that EU stuff, please show me how a liberal government caused this.
A liberal governemt caused this?
Please. A liberal government handled the inevitable better than a Conservative one, that's all that's got to do with anything.
Alonzo
03-28-2008, 02:24 PM
True mia, a conservatives government would have issued this statement:
We are horrified by the action of these young sluts for failing to keep their legs shut. They need to learn responsibility and hopefully they will learn their lesson by having to take care of their new baby"
cronic
03-28-2008, 04:21 PM
Wrong!
and no.. i can't agree with that El...
atleast nowadays if thats what your asking me...not now..
Ok sorry I took it as you were still the way you were when you chose the houses and agreed with it, my fault.
when I was a teenager.. hell yes
I supported them activities then because I was a teen and it was fun for me as a teen. I'm not a teen anymore so naturally i don't and wont support that kind of behavior because I know its not a healthy activity
So you don't support it now that you are legally able to do it but you supported it when you weren't able to legally do it, am I right in that assumption then?
Yes.. u are correct in your assumptions...
I don't support it now because again.. I think its unhealthy activities,
and as far as supporting it as a teen.. sure.. I was a teen.. i wasn't worried about unhealthy lifestyles.. i wanted to have fun.
alot of teens are like that today and alot of teens were like that back when i was a teen.
got it?
Osborn F. Enready
03-28-2008, 05:45 PM
The same things are happening now, that have always happened, but kids today see how corrupt the entire system and most people are in reality, and are a lot more open without fear of repercussions anymore.
Kids between 13 and 18 are not NEARLY as naieve and innocent as 90% of the parents out there would like to think.
The real point I think is that kids are picking up on how corrupt our system is becoming, how little meaning law and order have anymore, and they can plainly see hypocrisy in a large portion of the adults who "advise them" and "raise them".
Between the internets new freedom of information, and the facts their little eyes take in around them everyday, I think kids today have much less respect for authority than many of us ever did, and it should come as no suprise when ADULTS allow it to happen at every level, from police abuse to government abuse of individual rights.
Our culture of corruption is teaching kids corruption is the "status quo", and its hard to argue that its not, when in todays world, it surely is.
Osborn F. Enready
03-28-2008, 05:50 PM
Also, you can see from this example if it is in fact true, just how LITTLE if ANYTHING the prohibition laws do.
I know when I was underage, just like today, getting what I want is not, was not, a problem, legal or not.
People who think these laws work, are fooling themselves and denying the reality of the amount of money spent, the amount of non-violent offenders in prison, and the lack of numerical change in users.
Alonzo
03-28-2008, 06:03 PM
I think kids today have much less respect for authority than many of us ever did, and it should come as no suprise when ADULTS allow it to happen at every level, from police abuse to government abuse of individual rights.
I wasn't really raised to respect authority, and I never acted like that as a kid. Growing up, even back to the preschool days, I was told cops are always abusing their power. To sum up what my mother used to teach me "Go to a cop if you need help because they're the ones who can help you, but never trust them unless you have to". She felt the same about practically everyone with power.
As a kid I was also taught to call adults by their first names. That caused some strange reactions by the parents when I first moved to a new town when I was 6, but they soon realized I was taught that. To this day though I hate calling people by their last name, and I absolutely cannot stand to use maam or sir as it makes me feeling like I'm belittling myself. I think it's just how I was raised.
I think the problems today have more than to do with a lack of respect.
Osborn F. Enready
03-28-2008, 07:20 PM
Alonzo said:
I think the problems today have more than to do with a lack of respect.
No doubt, I am sure there are a multitude of contributing factors, but I really think the role of authority in our culture over the last 50 years, and its growth, is contributing greatly as a cultural influence.
I don't have a problem with authority, as long as its "justified" authority.
I think the hypocrisy problem in todays authority figures (police, politicians, preachers, teachers, etc) is a big part of it.
Truth_and_Power
03-28-2008, 07:27 PM
Alonzo said:
I think the problems today have more than to do with a lack of respect.
No doubt, I am sure there are a multitude of contributing factors, but I really think the role of authority in our culture over the last 50 years, and its growth, is contributing greatly as a cultural influence.
I don't have a problem with authority, as long as its "justified" authority.
I think the hypocrisy problem in todays authority figures (police, politicians, preachers, teachers, etc) is a big part of it.
I agree wholeheartedly. I think eliminating prohibition laws on substances that many of the enforcement officers atleast tried in their younger years, as well as other laws that are clearly "don't get caught" type of laws, we would reduce this level of disprespect.
The same things are happening now, that have always happened, but kids today see how corrupt the entire system and most people are in reality, and are a lot more open without fear of repercussions anymore.
Kids between 13 and 18 are not NEARLY as naieve and innocent as 90% of the parents out there would like to think.
The real point I think is that kids are picking up on how corrupt our system is becoming, how little meaning law and order have anymore, and they can plainly see hypocrisy in a large portion of the adults who "advise them" and "raise them".
Between the internets new freedom of information, and the facts their little eyes take in around them everyday, I think kids today have much less respect for authority than many of us ever did, and it should come as no suprise when ADULTS allow it to happen at every level, from police abuse to government abuse of individual rights.
Our culture of corruption is teaching kids corruption is the "status quo", and its hard to argue that its not, when in todays world, it surely is.
If that's the case what was the reason for it in the roaring 20's, and the free love/drug use of the 60's and 70's?
I think people want to have sex and get high. No morality or legislation instilled in them is ever going to rid them of the innate desire; for many it does place limits on their actions.
cronic
03-28-2008, 11:27 PM
I think people want to have sex and get high. No morality or legislation instilled in them is ever going to rid them of the innate desire; for many it does place limits on their actions.
I believe that is true with alot teens
But after we grow up.. alot of that leaves us.. many quit that lifestyle but not everyone..
My parents don't get high now.. but when they was teens.. they was boozers.. my mom popped pills and drank..
( i don't know if they smoked pot ever.. I don't think so..) My point im trying to make is they are from a different generation.. and to know them now.. you would think.. "Square"
I think morals are lacking more now with kids like Os has said.. but.. morals or not.. there is always that wild bunch of kids.. and I think that today.. you see more of them ..
teens like to have fun.. they don't have that fear.. they don't care about ramifications.. they just want to party.. now.. in the 60's. and in the 20's to I bet...
By the time I was 10 or so.. I wanted that also.. I went to church and bible school..
I went to a good public school..
But I was a kid.. with ideas in my head and i wanted to try things.. I wanted to have fun
By the time I was 12, I had already been drunk a few times.. I was smoking alot of pot and shortly after.. i was having sex..
I was far from alone also in my fun.. many other kids in my school was doin it.. many wasn't also.. but many was
To be surprised by this topic should be unimaginable as these kids I doubt are much different from most other kids and this has been happening for a long time.. its just more out there today... probably a little more of it going on to
I'm not a teen and I still like sex. :p
I'd still like to get 'high' every now and then too. I'm including alcohol, just to broadly cover the concept. The point is people want to alter their mind-state. It's a matter of type and degree and frequency, and that does not change after adulthood. For me, (2) beers is quite enough. For another it takes (16) or a stronger substance.
Being a teen is sometimes associated with mild or wild experimentation, which is a bit of a different thing.
cronic
03-28-2008, 11:46 PM
I'm not a teen and I still like sex. :p
I'd still like to get 'high' every now and then too. I'm including alcohol, just to broadly cover the concept. The point is people want to alter their mind-state. It's a matter of type and degree and frequency, and that does not change after adulthood. For me, (2) beers is quite enough. For another it takes (16) or a stronger substance.
Being a teen is sometimes associated with mild or wild experimentation, which is a bit of a different thing.
Im not a teen anymore either.. I like smoking weed.. and having sex also..lol
I don't drink anymore.. nope.. no more no more.. yay.. no more..lol
but ..It does change in adulthood for some Mia.. not all.. but yes.. for some it does
not only did my parents change alot. but.. my cousin got high in high school..drank with me.. smoked with me... then got married at age 20.. and then..BAM changed completely.. quit smoking dope.. doesnt drink.. he wont even cuss anymore..lol
Now.. I'm not sure he changed for himself..lol
His wifey I think had alot to do with it
Well of course anything is true for some - the original point I was making is that PEOPLE WANT TO HAVE SEX AND GET HIGH.
I don't mean that's all they want to do or want to do it all the time (of course some do ;-) but sex and altering the mind-state are both innate pleasures that we (most) seek whether that be occasionally or daily.
There are degrees - most people have no desire to smoke crack, for instance.
And sex and drugs really shouldn't be placed side by side because there's nothing wrong with the former daily, but the latter is unhealthy that way ;-)
Osborn F. Enready
03-29-2008, 12:16 AM
I don't dispute that at all Mia. I like both myself. ;)
My point is that the same percentage of corruption and hypocrisy existed in the 20's, if not more, but modern communication, instant news access, instant messaging, etc, have changed the way news hits us.
Major corporate news now is all about extremes, headlines and etc. (not that they weren't before, but I think it has gotten worse as monopoly capitalism gained a foothold in the law.) Today, there is just much more news because of more access, more resources, wider coverage... and of course, more people and more news.
I think this access is wonderful, and should continue to grow, but at the same time, parents have a hard job today, especially if one parent doesn't stay home, keeping their kids on the path they want to set for them.
For instance.... I had an aquaintance that didn't even know what chocolate was, until he was like 9 years old. The parents had food allergies, so it was never in the house, and tv was not a big part of their lives. There was no internet, and radio use was fairly limited by the parents.
Can you even imagine trying to do that (good or bad) today? If you don't live out in the country, it would be extremely hard, impossible if you sent them to public schools.
A lot of kids today can't even imagine a world without an internet....
We certainly have some challenges as a free people, but I believe freedom is worth it. I do wish more parents would take better responsibility for their kids though....
I thought it was rough when I hit the job market in 1990..... Kids today have a much tougher market to face than I ever did out of High School.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.