PDA

View Full Version : Poll of troops in Iraq sees 72% support for withdrawal!!!


Tessy
03-23-2008, 06:49 AM
Seventy-two percent of troops on the ground in Iraq think U.S. military forces should get out of the country! This is according to a Zogby poll released about one month ago.

The survey of 944 troops, conducted in Iraq between Jan. 18 and Feb. 14, said that only 23 percent of service members thought U.S. forces should stay “as long as they are needed.” LOL!!! Kinda blows away some of the ridiculous arguments I'm hearing here at this site from people pretending to speak for the troops.

Of the 72 percent, 22 percent said troops should leave within the next six months, and 29 percent said they should withdraw “immediately.” Twenty-one percent said the U.S. military presence should end within a year; 5 percent weren’t sure when but just thought total withdrawal was the best thing.

Of course bozos calling themselves "policy experts" in the media try to spin it - I guess for the continued approval of the few remaining brainwashed gun-ho fools.

Justin Logan, a perfect example calling himself a "foreign policy analyst" for the Cato Institute, called the figure alarming, and a sign that the Bush administration and troops in Iraq see the goals and the progress of the war very differently. LOL, like it's just a big misunderstanding and only a lack of communication... Hehehhee.

The president has opposed any plans for a withdrawal date, saying troops will remain until Iraq’s security is assured. Logan sees so many troops recommending absolute withdrawal as showing “an alarming disconnect” between the policy and its implementation. He obviously doesn't seem to understand that in-country troops know what they're saying and why they are saying it.

But Loren Thompson, a military analyst with the Lexington Institute, called those who support withdrawal scared and inferred they were cowards saying: troops who say the U.S. should withdraw could be concerned for their own safety, and then tried to spin it and cover himself all at once saying: or they could be optimistic about progress so far, then admitted under his breath and lastly as if it were nearly impossible admitting: or they could simply be opposed to the idea of operations in Iraq.

“You have to pick apart each servicemember’s thought process to understand what that means,” he said. “I think this is about personal circumstances, and not proof there is a higher rate of troops who desire departure.”

Defense Department officials declined to comment on the poll at all.

John Zogby, CEO of the polling company, said the poll was funded through Le Moyne College’s Center for Peace and Global Studies. Zogby said the survey was conducted face-to-face throughout Iraq, with permission from commanders. Despite the difficulty of polling in a war zone, he said, pollsters were pleased with the results.

“This is a credible and representative look at what the troops are saying,” he said. “Clearly there are those [in the U.S.] who will speak for the troops, so there is a real value in seeing what they are actually saying.”

The poll also shows that 42 percent of the troops surveyed are unsure of their mission in Iraq, and that 85 percent believe a major reason they were sent into war was “to retaliate for Saddam’s role in the Sept. 11 attacks.” Ninety-three percent said finding and destroying weapons of mass destruction is not a reason for the ongoing military action.

“We were surprised by that, especially the 85 percent [figure],” Zogby said. “Clearly that is much higher than the consensus among the American public, and the public’s perception [on that topic] is much higher than the actual reality of the situation.”

In terms of current operations, 80 percent of those polled said they did not hold a negative view of all Iraqis because of the ongoing attacks against coalition military forces.

More than 43 percent of those polled said their equipment, such as Humvees, body armor and munitions, is adequate for the jobs facing them, while 30 percent said it is not. I guess you can tell which group has been fired on. :D

Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C. and chairman of the Victory in Iraq Caucus, a group of 118 Republican lawmakers, said the poll does not diminish his opinion of the importance of the armed forces role in Iraq. This is not much different than Nam where the war-hawks seemed committed to sacrificing as many American lives as it took in order to secure an environment in which American corporations could thrive.

“Whatever the percentages are, I know 100 percent of our troops want to complete their mission over there,” he said. “My view is, whatever the poll results say, the bottom line is these are troops who will continue their mission, because they would rather fight the enemy overseas than at home.”

Of those surveyed, 75 percent have served multiple tours in Iraq, 63 percent were under 30 years old, and 75 percent were male.

jafar00
03-23-2008, 10:42 AM
Some interesting figures there. Not that this poll will do anything to stop the madness, but it's nice to know.

apdst
03-23-2008, 07:57 PM
The boys wanna come home? Gee, there's a shocker. Imagine troops in a theater of operations that would rather be at home.

Tessy
03-23-2008, 09:47 PM
That wasn't the question. It wasn't how it was posed to them at all. The questions were not about what they as individuals wanted. It was about what they as individuals thought the war planners should do.

Good try, but just like every single one of your other insane arguments this is a big-time straw man. You don't care though - I know that. You only want carnage and to see all Iraqis dead and bleeding in the streets. People like you won't be satisfied till every last child is dead and rotting in the fields. You've made that quite clear already!

Easy90
03-23-2008, 09:50 PM
Army re-enlistments are ahead of projections...and in spite of what Hollywood would have you believe...morale is high. Only the enemy, (which includes the libs) want to change all that.

"70 percent of soldiers eligible to re-enlist in 2006 did so — a re-enlistment rate higher than before Sept. 11, 2001. For the past 10 years, the enlisted retention rates of the Army have exceeded 100 percent. As of last Nov. 13, Army re-enlistment was 137 percent of its stated goal." source (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,339296,00.html)

Tessy
03-23-2008, 11:58 PM
Fox... LOL!!!! you HAVE to be kidding! You believe that???

Hey I have some property on mars I'll sell you real cheap!


Why not read the real news? Do a search for "Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS)" and "Forced Re-Enlistment". Good try tho...

You hawks will try to say anything won't you?

BoogyMan
03-24-2008, 01:19 AM
You should source your commentary Tessy. It appears that you have taken an article directly from Stars and Stripes, changed a couple of words, and posted it as your own work. We call that plagiarism.

Oh, and did I mention the Stars and Stripes article was from 2006.

http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=34538&archive=true

apdst
03-24-2008, 02:02 AM
Great job, Boogy.

Troubadour
03-24-2008, 08:11 AM
Seventy-two percent of troops on the ground in Iraq think U.S. military forces should get out of the country!


Apparently the troops are "emboldening the enemy" and "endangering the troops." :lmao:

nevadamedic
03-24-2008, 08:25 AM
Seventy-two percent of troops on the ground in Iraq think U.S. military forces should get out of the country! This is according to a Zogby poll released about one month ago.

The survey of 944 troops, conducted in Iraq between Jan. 18 and Feb. 14, said that only 23 percent of service members thought U.S. forces should stay “as long as they are needed.” LOL!!! Kinda blows away some of the ridiculous arguments I'm hearing here at this site from people pretending to speak for the troops.

Of the 72 percent, 22 percent said troops should leave within the next six months, and 29 percent said they should withdraw “immediately.” Twenty-one percent said the U.S. military presence should end within a year; 5 percent weren’t sure when but just thought total withdrawal was the best thing.

Of course bozos calling themselves "policy experts" in the media try to spin it - I guess for the continued approval of the few remaining brainwashed gun-ho fools.

Justin Logan, a perfect example calling himself a "foreign policy analyst" for the Cato Institute, called the figure alarming, and a sign that the Bush administration and troops in Iraq see the goals and the progress of the war very differently. LOL, like it's just a big misunderstanding and only a lack of communication... Hehehhee.

The president has opposed any plans for a withdrawal date, saying troops will remain until Iraq’s security is assured. Logan sees so many troops recommending absolute withdrawal as showing “an alarming disconnect” between the policy and its implementation. He obviously doesn't seem to understand that in-country troops know what they're saying and why they are saying it.

But Loren Thompson, a military analyst with the Lexington Institute, called those who support withdrawal scared and inferred they were cowards saying: troops who say the U.S. should withdraw could be concerned for their own safety, and then tried to spin it and cover himself all at once saying: or they could be optimistic about progress so far, then admitted under his breath and lastly as if it were nearly impossible admitting: or they could simply be opposed to the idea of operations in Iraq.

“You have to pick apart each servicemember’s thought process to understand what that means,” he said. “I think this is about personal circumstances, and not proof there is a higher rate of troops who desire departure.”

Defense Department officials declined to comment on the poll at all.

John Zogby, CEO of the polling company, said the poll was funded through Le Moyne College’s Center for Peace and Global Studies. Zogby said the survey was conducted face-to-face throughout Iraq, with permission from commanders. Despite the difficulty of polling in a war zone, he said, pollsters were pleased with the results.

“This is a credible and representative look at what the troops are saying,” he said. “Clearly there are those [in the U.S.] who will speak for the troops, so there is a real value in seeing what they are actually saying.”

The poll also shows that 42 percent of the troops surveyed are unsure of their mission in Iraq, and that 85 percent believe a major reason they were sent into war was “to retaliate for Saddam’s role in the Sept. 11 attacks.” Ninety-three percent said finding and destroying weapons of mass destruction is not a reason for the ongoing military action.

“We were surprised by that, especially the 85 percent [figure],” Zogby said. “Clearly that is much higher than the consensus among the American public, and the public’s perception [on that topic] is much higher than the actual reality of the situation.”

In terms of current operations, 80 percent of those polled said they did not hold a negative view of all Iraqis because of the ongoing attacks against coalition military forces.

More than 43 percent of those polled said their equipment, such as Humvees, body armor and munitions, is adequate for the jobs facing them, while 30 percent said it is not. I guess you can tell which group has been fired on. :D

Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C. and chairman of the Victory in Iraq Caucus, a group of 118 Republican lawmakers, said the poll does not diminish his opinion of the importance of the armed forces role in Iraq. This is not much different than Nam where the war-hawks seemed committed to sacrificing as many American lives as it took in order to secure an environment in which American corporations could thrive.

“Whatever the percentages are, I know 100 percent of our troops want to complete their mission over there,” he said. “My view is, whatever the poll results say, the bottom line is these are troops who will continue their mission, because they would rather fight the enemy overseas than at home.”

Of those surveyed, 75 percent have served multiple tours in Iraq, 63 percent were under 30 years old, and 75 percent were male.


Actually I have talked to a number of troops and so have a lot of people I know and they agree with the mission and think it is worth it, they just want a break.

PostmodernProphet
03-24-2008, 11:54 AM
Oh, and did I mention the Stars and Stripes article was from 2006.

lol......ouch......

Truth_and_Power
03-24-2008, 03:12 PM
The president has opposed any plans for a withdrawal date, saying troops will remain until Iraq’s security is assured.

Has germany's security been assured? What about south korea? Japan? AMERICA?

Is it too much to ask that our troops guard america until our security has been assured. I know, I know, I'm a radical.

Wndrtch
03-24-2008, 03:39 PM
So, if I poll a bunch of cops in St. Louis, and they say they would prefer to be in another city (because St. Louis is the most dangerous city in America), then we should pull cops out of St Louis? That's basically your argument.

Seems a bit absurd to me. Soldiers, like our cops, are professionals, and will do what is asked of them, despite their opinions to the contrary. If they really had a problem with Iraq, they would leave the military when their time is up, and that ain't hap'nin.

But thanks again for proving my sig line correct.

Easy90
03-24-2008, 03:55 PM
I kinda doubt all the troops were asked for their opinions. The title of this thread might be more accurate if it were something like: "Newspaper opinion poll held, and 72% of those responding indicated they would prefer to not be in Iraq." Of course, anyone can structure a poll to provide whatever "data" they wish...as obviously is the case here.

potter
03-24-2008, 04:29 PM
Actually I have talked to a number of troops and so have a lot of people I know and they agree with the mission and think it is worth it, they just want a break.


Too bad for them eh? I can't imagine taking a job and then whining about it.....

Tessy
03-25-2008, 05:26 AM
Yeah potter, I don't know any of the troops that whine about being there. This is an excuse used by hawks to discredit and dismiss the opinions of the troops about the operations of the company (or military/US Government in this case) and it's policies. To say that it's whining or just guys wanting to go home, preferring not to be there, or wanting to take a break is a huge HUGE disrespect to the men and women who joined thinking they were fighting for the freedom of a nation and the human rights of a people.

Those hawks are basically taking the sacrifices of men and women willing and capable of doing such a thing and spitting on it saying that their own personal comfort is more important to them than something they actually feel strong enough about to lay down their lives for.

Pretty pathetic what some people will do just to win an argument or justify their wrongful opinions.

PostmodernProphet
03-25-2008, 10:48 AM
Pretty pathetic what some people will do just to win an argument or justify their wrongful opinions.
no kidding.....

Oh, and did I mention the Stars and Stripes article was from 2006.

Easy90
03-25-2008, 01:26 PM
No doubt in my military mind that were a poll to have been taken among the troops involved in the Battle of The Bulge (That was during WWII for you libs)...the vast majority of them would have expressed an opinion that they would prefer to not be there.

The big difference between then and now is, we didn't have so many traitors amongst the media and general population who would have exploited that sentiment so as to help the enemy, and for the purpose of discrediting the Commander In Chief.

..."the poll was funded through Le Moyne College’s Center for Peace and Global Studies, which received money for the project from an anonymous, anti-war activist,..."

LOL! Yeah, and the libs don't like FOX news because it's really not "fair and balanced"

Tessy
03-25-2008, 04:29 PM
No doubt in my military mind that were a poll to have been taken among the troops involved in the Battle of The Bulge (That was during WWII for you libs)...the vast majority of them would have expressed an opinion that they would prefer to not be there.

I think you're very wrong. I think many of them would question the strategy but not their own will. Only those who have never been in battle or were in it for some sick reasoning would suggest that soldiers didn't believe in it.

The big difference between then and now is, we didn't have so many traitors amongst the media and general population who would have exploited that sentiment so as to help the enemy, and for the purpose of discrediting the Commander In Chief.

That's really reaching! Show me where in this thread Bush is even mentioned! I guess blood lusting hawks that get their rocks off on watching people die and splattering baby brains should try harder to admit that so they can get help rather than trying to hide behind the political shirttails of those questioning the president's judgement.

..."the poll was funded through Le Moyne College’s Center for Peace and Global Studies, which received money for the project from an anonymous, anti-war activist,..."

LOL! Yeah, and the libs don't like FOX news because it's really not "fair and balanced"


The difference of course being that this poll comes straight out with the information and tells you exactly who funded it, who they're affiliated with and what their own political position is on the issue even though it may not matter a bit.

BoogyMan
03-25-2008, 05:29 PM
I guess you have chosen not to respond to the fact that you plagiarized this article from 2006 Tessy?

preservanation
03-25-2008, 05:41 PM
I think most people want to leave Iraq...2 year old study aside, but the question is do we want to leave in victory with a stable Iraq and a strong ally in an important strategic region in the region, or do we want to leave with our tails between our legs in defeat, giving AQ a huge psychological victory and cede the region and resources to radicals, Iran, Syria and others who will use it as a base of operations to do us harm, not to mention the untold humanitarian horrors which will ensue.

I know some will say "Wellllll, we shouldn't be there in the first place".
Great whine about that all you want...and you do, but what are we going to do NOW?
Get over the reasons how we got there and deal with the present.

Tessy
03-25-2008, 05:52 PM
Complex questions require careful consideration indeed. I doubt very seriously the military needs to play much of a roll in the solution however. Too bad our federal government is so damn corrupt that any real peaceful solutions wouldn't stand a chance of not being sabotaged and result in being just a terrible waste.