PDA

View Full Version : The Crucible


dsanthony
08-24-2006, 11:20 PM
Just finished watching a PBS special on Miller, Kazan and the Un-American activities probes during the 50s. I'm sure some have strong views on HUAC and the cold war in general. I'm addressing specifically Arthur Miller's play, "The Crucible"--which was written as an allegory for the House Committee.

For a little background, both Miller and Kazan were members of the US Communist Party in the 30s... actually most of the New York intelligentsia of the 30s through the 60s were either members of the communist party or closet supporters. A list of the writers who belonged to communist groups is very long, and includes almost every black writer of note from that period, from Richard Wright to Ralph Ellison.

Miller wrote "The Crucible" in response to the HUAC activities. There is, of course, a lie at the center of Miller's analogy. The Salem Witch trials uncovered no witches, but only served to vent the hostilities and repressions of small town life. The HUAC and other investigations into communism in Hollywood, the government and military exposed real communists--many of which were possible or actual threats to national security.

It was false of Miller to use his fiction to pass on the illusion that the communist hunts were "witch hunts". They were not. You may reasonably argue that the committee hearings were unconstitutional or unamerican. You may not reasonably say that they did not uncover real communists in America.

Rider
08-24-2006, 11:26 PM
The left (especially the Hollywood left) is still in high dudgeon over the hearings. Trouble is, the more evidence that is produced as time goes by, the more obvious it is that the hearings were right on target.

dsanthony
08-24-2006, 11:40 PM
Well, they did not really persecute "innocent" people in the sense that the vast majority of people "named" actually were communists or communist sympathizers. On the other hand, they did persecute "innocent" people because it is not illegal to be a communist.

Rider
08-24-2006, 11:55 PM
You're right, but sometimes necessity (as in war) overrides law. If the Communists hadn't been faced in those hearings the consequences could have been a vastly different world today. I don't think that outcome would have done our Constitution any good.

dsanthony
08-25-2006, 12:27 AM
As I said, my focus was on Miller and the crucible, and not to rehash cold war views.

AlonzoMourning23
08-25-2006, 01:51 AM
There being communists picked out, and there being communists picked out that were soviet spies and real threats to the u.s., are two different things. And the category of communist sympathizer covers far more than actual sympathizers. It would be like placing the extreme left in charge of deciding who's a fascist or a fascist sympathizer. We got a bunch of people on this board who would be labelled a fascist sympathizer under such circumstances.

I wouldn't trust Mccarthy to pick out a communist sympathizer, and I would trust michael moore to pick out a fascist sympathizer. And in this case, there wasn't much you could do to defend yourself.