PDA

View Full Version : Russia tracks rogue U.S. satellite containing nuclear material


December
02-16-2008, 01:54 AM
15/ 02/ 2008

http://img.rian.ru/images/9926/48/99264855.jpg

MOSCOW, February 15 (RIA Novosti) - Russia's Defense Ministry is closely monitoring a U.S. spy satellite that has gone out of control and may have nuclear material on board, a high-ranking defense source said on Friday.

"The Defense Ministry is using its space surveillance systems to track the satellite's movement in orbit," he said.
Russian military experts suggest the satellite could have an on board nuclear power source, a senior parliament member said.

Igor Barinov, first deputy chairman of the State Duma Defense Committee, also expressed concern that the U.S. had made a unilateral decision to destroy the satellite.
He said that decisions, which could jeopardize collective security, "should be made taking into account all parties concerned and all countries involved in space research."

The U.S. Defense Department said Thursday it would shoot down the decaying satellite, which it earlier considered to be low risk. The department said the chances that the "uncontrollable U.S. experimental satellite" will hit a populated area are small, but "the potential consequences would be of enough concern to consider mitigating actions."

The U.S. will attempt to shoot down the satellite using a Navy Standard Missile 3, U.S. officials said.

They said the satellite will be shot down after the space shuttle Atlantis, which is in orbit, completes its mission and lands next week. NASA officials do not want to risk sending debris into the path of shuttle.

Marine Corps Gen. James E. Cartwright, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said U.S. officials would attempt to hit the satellite at an altitude of 130 nautical miles, or just outside Earth's atmosphere, so that most of the debris would fall to Earth within two orbits.
He said the window of opportunity for taking the satellite down would open in three or four days, and would last for about seven or eight days.
If the missile shot is successful, much of the debris will burn up as it falls. The goal is to hit the fuel tank in order to minimize the amount of fuel that returns to Earth, Cartwright said.

The satellite was launched in 2006 and malfunctioned almost immediately. On board is around 1,000 pounds of propellant fuel (hydrazine), a hazardous material.
President George W Bush has authorized the destruction of the satellite using a sea-to-air missile within the next few days.
Earlier the director of the Henry L. Stimson Center, which monitors space security and research Michael Krepon, said that the reasons given for shooting down the satellite were "unpersuasive," adding previous satellites that had gone out of control had not caused any damage.

"The president has decided to take action to mitigate the risk to human lives by engaging the nonfunctioning satellite," the Defense Department explained in a news announcement. "Because our missile defense system is not designed to engage satellites, extraordinary measures have been taken to temporarily modify three sea-based tactical missiles and three ships to carry out the engagement."

Several government agencies are involved in monitoring and planning for re-entry of the satellite.

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080215/99347040.html

That is scary..... :(

dgun
02-16-2008, 04:15 AM
Russian military experts suggest the satellite could have an on board nuclear power source

Why the crap would you need a nuclear power source on a satellite? With the small power requirements of a satellite, a battery charged by solar energy would be more than sufficient.

Keith Hamburger
02-16-2008, 04:21 AM
[quote=dgun]Why the crap would you need a nuclear power source on a satellite? With the small power requirements of a satellite, a battery charged by solar energy would be more than sufficient./quote]

Actually, radio-thermal generators are quite common on satellites. They're most commonly used on inter-planetary and inter-stellar satellites, but they can be used on other satellites for a backup or additional power source.

However, I think it might be a bit hypocritical for the Russians to be making a big issue of it. I imagine they use similar equipment.

Keith

December
02-16-2008, 03:15 PM
Quote: The satellite was launched in 2006 and malfunctioned almost immediately.

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080215/99347040.html

Hmmmm..... :ponder:

December
02-21-2008, 01:09 AM
Pentagon: Window opens for spy satellite shoot-down
WASHINGTON, Feb. 20 (Xinhua) -- The window of opportunity to shoot down a dying spy satellite is now open, right after the landing of space shuttle Atlantis, the Pentagon said on Wednesday.

"We're now into the window," a senior Pentagon official told a news conference shortly after space shuttle Atlantis landed at Kennedy Space Center in Florida at 9:07 a.m. EST (1407 GMT) on Wednesday.

READ MORE - http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-02/21/content_7638066.htm

Questerr
02-21-2008, 08:28 AM
Quote: The satellite was launched in 2006 and malfunctioned almost immediately.

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080215/99347040.html

Hmmmm..... :ponder:


Why is this so suspicious? If you look back on the history of satellite and space probe launches, there have been lots of failed launches and platforms that suffered catastrophic failures. Every country's space program suffers them.

They just happen. It doesn't imply malevolence.

Besides, do you realize how expensive building and launching a satellite is?

Grizz
02-21-2008, 10:01 AM
Not to worry - they hit it:

Missile Strikes a Spy Satellite Falling From Its Orbit


By THOM SHANKER
Published: February 21, 2008

WASHINGTON — A missile interceptor launched from a Navy warship has struck a dying American spy satellite orbiting 130 miles over the Pacific Ocean, the Pentagon announced late Wednesday.

Officials cautioned that while early information indicated that the interceptor’s “kill vehicle” had hit the satellite, it would be 24 hours before it could be determined whether the fuel tank with 1,000 pounds of toxic hydrazine had been destroyed as planned.

Even so, one official who received a late-night briefing on the mission expressed confidence that the impact had been so powerful that the fuel tank probably had been ruptured.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/21satellite.html?hp

December
02-21-2008, 02:27 PM
Why is this so suspicious? If you look back on the history of satellite and space probe launches, there have been lots of failed launches and platforms that suffered catastrophic failures. Every country's space program suffers them.

They just happen. It doesn't imply malevolence.

Besides, do you realize how expensive building and launching a satellite is?


Well, you are right - there have been lots of failed launches and platforms that suffered catastrophic failures. However, these catastrophic failures have been taken place some 30 - 40 years ago.
Launching a sputnik (aka satellite) these days is no big deal. Russia even sends SPACE TOURISTS into kozmos.


Belarus says U.S. tested new space weapon

21/ 02/ 2008

MINSK, February 21 (RIA Novosti) - The Belarusian defense minister accused the United States on Thursday of using the destruction of a defunct NASA satellite to test a new space weapon.
An SM-3 missile fired at 3:26 a.m. GMT this morning from the USS Lake Erie, a Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser, hit the bus-sized satellite about 247 kilometers (133 nautical miles) above the ocean to the northwest of Hawaii.

"The cruiser that launched the missile has participated in a number of missile tests, and here they have got a perfect opportunity to conduct a real launch," Leonid Maltsev said. "Any military commander would have used such an opportunity."
Russia's Defense Ministry said on Thursday it would closely monitor the consequences of the operation.

"We will study the results of this operation," Col.-Gen. Anatoly Nogovitsyn, deputy Air Force commander said. "The satellite's trajectory was far from Russia and the Russian Federation was not threatened by the hit."

READ MORE - http://en.rian.ru/world/20080221/99798634.html