Trish
02-05-2008, 11:29 AM
Feb 5, 2008 4:12 am US/Eastern
Kennedy: Vote For Obama Is Like Vote For JFK, RFK
Barack Relishing Underdog Role In New Jersey Primary
Marcia Kramer
EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (CBS) ― Super Tuesday is turning out to be the Super Bowl of politics for the Democrats.
A new CBS News poll has Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama neck-and-neck nationally. While campaigning at the Meadowlands on Monday Obama compared his underdog status to that of the Giants.
Obama swooped into the Meadowlands with Sen. Ted Kennedy and niece Caroline just hours after the underdog Giants won the Super Bowl.
"Think we should take heart, Ted, by the fact that sometimes the underdog pulls it out," Obama said.
Obama was in the hunt for New Jersey's 127 delegates after a new Quinnipiac poll showed him picking up 11 points since Jan. 23. It's now Clinton 48, Obama 43.
"I'm here today to ask the people of New Jersey to do the same, cast the same votes for Barack Obama as they cast for John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy," Ted Kennedy said.
Clinton, meanwhile, lost her voice some 100 miles north, but seemed much better later in the day.
"We need to be investing today to build what we need to have a strong economy," she said in a raspy tone during a rally in New Haven, Conn.
And with the Super Tuesday contest with Obama tightening she also lost her composure, tearing up as a New Haven public interest lawyer recalled working with Clinton as a student in the 1970s.
"I said I would not tear up," Clinton said. "Already we're not on that path."
Clinton then brought her campaign push to New York City for a taping on the "Late Show With David Letterman." There she made CBS 2 HD a campaign promise: No new taxes, at least for a lot of people.
"We should not be raising taxes on the middle class people who are struggling to make ends meet and that includes a lot of people in New York," Clinton said.
Both Democrats are wrapping up an intense round of campaigning as voters in some two dozen states go to the polls Tuesday.
The Democratic contest is so tight that many see Sens. Clinton and Obama continuing to duke it out eve after Super Tuesday.
http://wcbstv.com/campaign08/hillary.clinton.barack.2.645666.html
Obama may indeed be a voice for change in government. IF he is actually sincere in what he says and not just spouting rhetoric, and IF he has the political savvy to back up his positions, he may indeed be a catalyst for change. However, whenever I see the comparison between Obama and JFK, I wonder exactly how far we are expected to take that comparison. Obama is definitely a liberal and JFK was a liberal as well, socially. JFK was a catalyst for change, yet in many of his positions he was not the liberal that Obama is. JFK's stand on taxes and on the position of the US globally, espeically regarding our military, were definitely not liberal - at least not as liberal is defined today. I have to wonder just how many people are actually doing a comparison between the political positions of JFK and those of Obama. While there may be similarities between the two, that comparison may be even more significant when viewed from the differences in the two.
Kennedy: Vote For Obama Is Like Vote For JFK, RFK
Barack Relishing Underdog Role In New Jersey Primary
Marcia Kramer
EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (CBS) ― Super Tuesday is turning out to be the Super Bowl of politics for the Democrats.
A new CBS News poll has Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama neck-and-neck nationally. While campaigning at the Meadowlands on Monday Obama compared his underdog status to that of the Giants.
Obama swooped into the Meadowlands with Sen. Ted Kennedy and niece Caroline just hours after the underdog Giants won the Super Bowl.
"Think we should take heart, Ted, by the fact that sometimes the underdog pulls it out," Obama said.
Obama was in the hunt for New Jersey's 127 delegates after a new Quinnipiac poll showed him picking up 11 points since Jan. 23. It's now Clinton 48, Obama 43.
"I'm here today to ask the people of New Jersey to do the same, cast the same votes for Barack Obama as they cast for John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy," Ted Kennedy said.
Clinton, meanwhile, lost her voice some 100 miles north, but seemed much better later in the day.
"We need to be investing today to build what we need to have a strong economy," she said in a raspy tone during a rally in New Haven, Conn.
And with the Super Tuesday contest with Obama tightening she also lost her composure, tearing up as a New Haven public interest lawyer recalled working with Clinton as a student in the 1970s.
"I said I would not tear up," Clinton said. "Already we're not on that path."
Clinton then brought her campaign push to New York City for a taping on the "Late Show With David Letterman." There she made CBS 2 HD a campaign promise: No new taxes, at least for a lot of people.
"We should not be raising taxes on the middle class people who are struggling to make ends meet and that includes a lot of people in New York," Clinton said.
Both Democrats are wrapping up an intense round of campaigning as voters in some two dozen states go to the polls Tuesday.
The Democratic contest is so tight that many see Sens. Clinton and Obama continuing to duke it out eve after Super Tuesday.
http://wcbstv.com/campaign08/hillary.clinton.barack.2.645666.html
Obama may indeed be a voice for change in government. IF he is actually sincere in what he says and not just spouting rhetoric, and IF he has the political savvy to back up his positions, he may indeed be a catalyst for change. However, whenever I see the comparison between Obama and JFK, I wonder exactly how far we are expected to take that comparison. Obama is definitely a liberal and JFK was a liberal as well, socially. JFK was a catalyst for change, yet in many of his positions he was not the liberal that Obama is. JFK's stand on taxes and on the position of the US globally, espeically regarding our military, were definitely not liberal - at least not as liberal is defined today. I have to wonder just how many people are actually doing a comparison between the political positions of JFK and those of Obama. While there may be similarities between the two, that comparison may be even more significant when viewed from the differences in the two.